Hospitalization Rates in Interstitial Lung Disease: An Analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Registry.

RATIONALE: Little is known about hospitalization in other types of interstitial lung disease (ILD) besides idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the frequency of hospitalizations in various types of ILD and elucidate the association of hospitalization with outcomes. METHODS: An analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry data was performed. Inpatient hospitalization rates and survival following hospitalization were compared for various types of ILD. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates were similar across ILD types (40.6% of IPF participants, 42.8% of connective tissue disease related ILD (CTD-ILD), 44.9% of non-IPF idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIPs), 46.5% of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) participants, and 53.3% of "other" ILD participants). All-cause hospitalization was not associated with decreased transplant-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.20, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.46, p=0.0759) after adjusting for co-morbidities and severity of illness; however respiratory-related hospitalization was (AHR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.90, p=0.0001). CTD-ILD (HR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.75, p=0.0031) and non-IPF IIP (HR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.58, p=0.005) had a lower risk of death following hospitalization compared to IPF while CHP (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.37, 1.20, p=0.1747) and "other-ILD" (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.54, p=0.25) had a comparable risk to IPF. CONCLUSION: Rates of hospitalization are similar across ILD subtypes. The risk of death or transplant following hospitalization is lower in CTD-ILD, CHP and non-IPF IIP compared to IPF participants. In a mixed population of ILD participants, all-cause hospitalizations were not associated with decreased transplant-free survival; however respiratory-related hospitalizations were.

Factors associated with listing for lung transplantation in IPF patients: An analysis of the pulmonary fibrosis foundation registry.

Rationale and objectives: Lung transplantation is a potentially life-saving treatment option for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, not all eligible candidates get referred and listed for transplantation. Amongst IPF patients within the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (PFF-R), we sought to determine the proportion of patients who undergo lung transplant listing and the characteristics associated with transplant listing. Methods: An analysis of IPF patients with at least six months of follow-up data was performed. Patients with well-established contraindications to lung transplantation were excluded. Two complementary analyses were performed. The "prevalent" population included all patients with IPF at time of enrollment into the registry. The "incident severe" population included all patients with IPF who progressed to GAP Stage 3. Results: Of the 2003 patients in the PFF-R, 475 patients were included in the "prevalent" population. Of this group, only 42 (8.8%) were either listed for or underwent lung transplant. Univariable analysis of the "prevalent" population found age (per 10 year increase, OR 0.531, p = 0.0025), percent predicted FVC (OR 0.572, p=<0.0001), percent predicted DLCO (OR 0.606, p < 0.0001), 6-min walk distance (per 50 m, OR 0.831, p = 0.019), and oxygen use at rest (OR 5.157, p < 0.0001) were predictive of listing. On multivariable analysis, age (per 10 year increase, OR 0.558, p = 0.0088), percent predicted FVC (OR 0.728, p = 0.0161), and oxygen use at rest (OR 3.264, p = 0.0029) remained significant predictors for lung transplant listing. The "incident severe" group consisted of 176 patients (8.8%). 24 patients (13.6%) from this cohort were either listed for or received a transplant. Only age (per 10 year increase, OR 0.0286, p = 0.0465) was associated with transplant listing on univariable analysis in the Incident severe population. Conclusion: Only a small proportion of potentially eligible patients with IPF are listed for lung transplantation, even when seen at pulmonary fibrosis centers of excellence. Advanced age appears to be the primary factor associated with failure to be listed. Further refinement of future registry data is required to more clearly delineate exact reasons for low rates of listing.

External validation and longitudinal application of the DO-GAP index to individualise survival prediction in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Background: The Distance-Oxygen-Gender-Age-Physiology (DO-GAP) index has been shown to improve prognostication in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) compared to the Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) score. We sought to externally validate the DO-GAP index compared to the GAP index for baseline risk assessment in patients with IPF. Additionally, we evaluated the utility of serial change in the DO-GAP index in predicting survival. Methods: We performed an analysis of patients with IPF from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation-Patient Registry (PFF-PR). Discrimination and calibration of the two models were assessed to predict transplant-free survival and IPF-related mortality. Joint longitudinal time-to-event modelling was utilised to individualise survival prediction based on DO-GAP index trajectory. Results: There were 516 patients with IPF from the PFF-PR with available demographics, pulmonary function tests, 6-min walk test data and outcomes included in this analysis. The DO-GAP index (C-statistic: 0.73) demonstrated improved discrimination in discerning transplant-free survival compared to the GAP index (C-statistic: 0.67). DO-GAP index calibration was adequate, and the model retained predictive accuracy to identify IPF-related mortality (C-statistic: 0.74). The DO-GAP index was similarly accurate in the subset of patients taking antifibrotic medications. Serial change in the DO-GAP index improved model discrimination (cross-validated area under the curve: 0.83) enabling the personalised prediction of disease trajectory in individual patients. Conclusion: The DO-GAP index is a simple, validated, multidimensional score that accurately predicts transplant-free survival in patients with IPF and can be adapted longitudinally in individual patients. The DO-GAP may also find use in studies of IPF to risk stratify patients and possibly as a clinical trial end-point.

Prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with COVID-19 related lung disease listed for lung transplantation: A UNOS registry analysis.

COVID-19 related lung disease (CRLD) has emerged as an indication for lung transplantation (LT) in highly select patients. The prevalence and prognostic implication of coexisting pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with CRLD listed for LT is not known. Adult patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database listed for LT for COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome or fibrosis through March 2022 were identified. The prevalence and impact of precapillary PH on pre- and posttransplantation survival was determined. Time-to-event analysis was used to compare outcomes between those with and without precapillary PH. We identified 245 patients listed for LT for CRLD who had right heart catheterization data available at the time of registry listing. Median age of the cohort was 54 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46, 60), 56 (22.9%) were female, and the median lung allocation score was 81.3 (IQR: 53.3, 89.4). The prevalence of precapillary PH at the time of transplant listing was 27.9%. There was no significant difference in pretransplant mortality in patients with and without precapillary PH (sHR: 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-1.7, p = 0.261). A total of 187 patients ultimately underwent LT; of those, 60 (31.0%) were identified as having precapillary PH during the waitlist period. Posttransplantation survival was similar between patients with and without pretransplant precapillary PH (hazard ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.2-3.7, p = 0.953). We observed a high rate of concomitant precapillary PH in patients listed for LT for CRLD. Though common, coexisting precapillary PH was not associated with a significant difference in either pre- or post-transplantation outcomes.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide via High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure Related to COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence exists regarding use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in spontaneously breathing patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of continuous iNO via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in COVID-19 respiratory failure. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cohort study of patients with respiratory failure from COVID-19 managed with HFNC. Patients were stratified by administration of iNO via HFNC. Regression analysis was used to compare the need for mechanical ventilation and secondary endpoints including hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, and need for extracorporeal life support. RESULTS: A total of 272 patients were identified and 66 (24.3%) of these patients received iNO via HFNC for a median of 88 h (interquartile range: 44, 135). After 12 h of iNO, supplemental oxygen requirement was unchanged or increased in 52.7% of patients. Twenty-nine (43.9%) patients treated with iNO compared to 79 (38.3%) patients without iNO therapy required endotracheal intubation (P = .47). After multivariable adjustment, there was no difference in need for mechanical ventilation between groups (odds ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-3.17), however, iNO administration was associated with longer hospital length of stay (incidence rate ratio: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.31-1.51). No difference was found for mortality, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy, or need for extracorporeal life support. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, iNO delivered via HFNC did not reduce oxygen requirements in the majority of patients or improve clinical outcomes. Given the observed association with increased length of stay, judicious selection of those likely to benefit from this therapy is warranted.

Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: Novel Sequelae of the Current Pandemic.

Since the initial identification of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. As effective vaccines and treatments begin to emerge, it will become increasingly important to identify and proactively manage the long-term respiratory complications of severe disease. The patterns of imaging abnormalities coupled with data from prior coronavirus outbreaks suggest that patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia are likely at an increased risk of progression to interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic pulmonary vascular disease. In this paper, we briefly review the definition, classification, and underlying pathophysiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD). We then review the current literature on the proposed mechanisms of lung injury in severe COVID-19 infection, and outline potential viral- and immune-mediated processes implicated in the development of post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF). Finally, we address patient-specific and iatrogenic risk factors that could lead to PCPF and discuss strategies for reducing risk of pulmonary complications/sequelae.

Incidence and prognostic significance of pleural effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

It has been suggested pleural effusions may develop in right heart failure in the absence of left heart disease. The incidence and prognostic significance of pleural effusions in pulmonary arterial hypertension is uncertain. Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension followed at our tertiary care center were reviewed. Survival was examined based on the subsequent development of a pleural effusion. A total of 191 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of pleural effusions on initial assessment was 7.3%. Among patients without a pleural effusion on initial imaging and at least one follow-up computerized tomography (N = 142), pleural effusion developed in 27.5% (N = 39) of patients. No alternative etiology of the effusion was identified in 19 (48.7%) cases and effusions deemed related to pulmonary arterial hypertension occurred at an incident rate of 38.6 cases per 1000 person-years. Of these, 14 (73.7%) were bilateral, 3 (15.8%) were right-sided, and 2 (10.5%) were left-sided. Effusion size was trace or small in 18 patients (94.7%). Development of a new pleural effusion was associated with attenuated survival in unadjusted survival analysis (HR: 3.80; 95% CI: 1.55-9.31), multivariate analysis (HR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.86-14.16), and after the multivariate model was adjusted for concomitant pericardial effusion (HR: 4.86; 95% CI: 1.51-15.71). Negative impact on survival remained unchanged when effusions more likely related to an alternative cause were removed from analysis. In conclusion, pleural effusions can complicate pulmonary arterial hypertension in the absence of left heart disease. These effusions are frequently small in size, bilateral in location, and their presence is associated with decreased survival. Attenuated survival appears independent of the risk associated with a new pericardial effusion.